Cornell disputes light-punishment claims in drugging, assault case

Cornell University Has Disputed Claims That Students Named In A Sexual Assault Lawsuit Were Allowed To Mitigate Their Punishment Simply By Submitting Essays, Calling The Characterization False And Warning It Could Deter Survivors From Coming Forward. When Asked About The Disciplinary Action Against The Accused Students, The Ivy League University Said That Any Suggestion That The University Did Not Impose Consequential Punishments For Those Involved Is False. “A Continuation Of The False Narrative That There Were Minimal Consequences In This Case Is Irresponsible, Will Make Survivors Feel Less Safe And Supported, And Will Perpetuate The Underreporting Of Sexual Assault,” The University Said In A Statement On Monday (local Time), Which It Sent To The Korea Times In Response To The Newspaper's Inquiry. The Response Came After A Former Cornell Student, Identified As Jane Doe, Filed A Lawsuit In New York This Month Alleging That Seven Members Of The School's Chi Phi Fraternity Drugged And Sexually Assaulted Her In October 2024, According To The Cornell Daily Sun. The University Said The

Name *

Email *

Comment *

Send comment